Overview
CHI 2025 anticipates more than 4,000 Papers submissions. The review process needs to handle this load while also providing high-quality reviews, which requires that each submission is handled by an expert Associate Chair (AC) who can recruit expert reviewers. The organization of the CHI program committee into topical subcommittees helps achieve this. See the description of the Papers review process for a detailed explanation of the responsibilities of the ACs and Subcommittee Chairs (SCs).
Authors should examine what constitutes a contribution to CHI and recognize that there are many different types of contribution possible for a CHI paper.
- Accessibility and Aging
- Blending Interaction: Engineering Interactive Systems & Tools
- Developing Novel Devices: Hardware, Materials, and Fabrication
- Computational Interaction
- Critical Computing, Sustainability, and Social Justice
- Design
- Games and Play
- Health
- Interacting with Devices: Interaction Techniques & Modalities
- Interaction Beyond the Individual
- Learning, Education, and Families
- Privacy and Security
- Specific Applications Areas
- Understanding People
- User Experience and Usability
- Visualization
Notes on Composition of Subcommittees
Once abstracts are submitted, individual subcommittees may grow or shrink based on the number of probable papers for that subcommittee. As in previous years, the paper chairs will be undertaking a survey to detail the diversity for each subcommittee. Please see, for example, this blog post on Diversity of the Program Committee for CHI 2020 which was published in July 2019.
Authors are required to suggest a subcommittee to review your submission. This page provides guidance on choosing the appropriate subcommittees for your submission.
Subcommittee Selection Process
When you submit a Paper, you can designate up to two appropriate subcommittees for your submission and we recommend that you indicate two. In the vast majority of cases, the subcommittee that will review your submission is one of the two subcommittees that you proposed. In cases where the Papers Chairs and/or Subcommittee Chairs recognize that your submission will be reviewed more thoroughly in another subcommittee, a submission may be transferred from one subcommittee to another. If a submission is transferred to another subcommittee, this will happen in the first week of the process, before reviewers are assigned; i.e., transferring will not affect a submission’s review process, it will only ensure that it receives the most complete, fair set of reviews.
Below, you will see a list of subcommittees and descriptions of the topics they are covering, the name of each SC, and the names of the ACs serving on each subcommittee. It is your responsibility to select the subcommittee that best matches the expertise needed to assess your research and that you believe will most fully appreciate your contribution to the field of HCI.
CHI has traditionally supported diverse and interdisciplinary work and continues to expand into new topics not previously explored. We recognize that as a result, you may find more than two subcommittees which are plausible matches for your work. However, for a number of reasons, it will be necessary for you to select no more than two target subcommittees, and you should strive to find the best matches based on what you think is the main contribution of your submission (examples of papers that are considered good matches are linked below for each subcommittee). You can also email the SCs for guidance if you are unsure (an email alias is provided below for each set of SCs).
Note that the scope of each subcommittee is not rigidly defined. Each has a broad mandate, and most subcommittees cover a collection of different topics. Further, SCs and ACs are all seasoned researchers, experienced with program committee review work, and each is committed to a process which seeks to assign each paper reviewers who are true experts in whatever the subject matter of the paper is. ACs recognize that many papers, or perhaps even most papers, will not perfectly fit the definition of their subcommittee’s scope. Consequently, papers will not be penalized or downgraded because they do not align perfectly with a particular subcommittee. Interdisciplinary, multi-topic, and cross-topic papers are encouraged and will be carefully and professionally judged by all subcommittees.
In making a subcommittee choice you should make careful consideration of what the most central and salient contribution of your work is, even if there are several different contributions. As an example, let’s say you are writing a paper about Ergonomic Business Practices for the Elderly using Novel Input Devices. Perhaps this is a very new topic. It covers a lot of ground. It’s not an exact fit for any of the subcommittees, but several choices are plausible. To choose between them, you need to make a reasoned decision about the core contributions of your work. Should it be evaluated in terms of the usage context for the target user community? The novel methodology developed for your study? The system and interaction techniques you have developed? Each of these evaluation criteria may partially apply, but try to consider which is most central and which you most want to highlight for your readers. Also look at the subcommittees, the people who will serve on them, and the kind of work they have been associated with in the past. Even if there are several subcommittees that could offer fair and expert assessments of this work, go with the one that really fits the most important and novel contributions of your paper. That committee will be in the best position to offer constructive and expert review feedback on the contributions of your research.
Each subcommittee description also links to several recent CHI papers that the SCs feel are good examples of papers that fit the scope of that subcommittee. Please look at these examples as a way to decide on the best subcommittee for your paper – but remember that these are just a few examples, and do not specify the full range of topics that would fit with any subcommittee.
List of the Subcommittees
Find a list of all subcommittees below.
Accessibility and Aging
This subcommittee is suitable for contributions related to the design or study of technology for people with disabilities and/or older adults. Accessibility papers are those that deal with technology designed for or used by people with disabilities including sensory, motor, mobility, psychosocial or cognitive, intellectual or learning disabilities, or people who identify as neurodivergent. Aging papers are broadly categorized as those dealing with technology designed for or used by people in the later stages of life. Relationships with technology are complex and multifaceted; we welcome contributions across a range of topics aimed at benefiting relevant stakeholder groups and not solely limited to concerns of making technology accessible. Note that if your paper primarily concerns health outcomes or interactions with health data or with healthcare providers, then the Health subcommittee is probably a better fit, whereas papers reflecting on how technologies are used or designed for specific needs are a better fit for this subcommittee. Submissions to this subcommittee will be evaluated, in part, based on how they include and potentially target user groups and other stakeholders. This subcommittee balances the rigor required in all CHI submissions with awareness of the challenges of conducting research in these important areas. This subcommittee welcomes all contributions related to accessibility and aging, including empirical, theoretical, conceptual, methodological, design, and systems contributions.
Strong submissions to this subcommittee will engage, as appropriate, with ongoing dialogues around ethical research praxis regarding representation of people from minoritized populations in the work. For example, papers that rely on data from non-disabled people should consider discussions around so-called “simulation studies” and how to avoid pitfalls of these methods. Your paper should also use inclusive language. Avoid characterizing an entire population using phrases that represent outlier positions for individuals, like “suffering from” (negative) or “inspirational” (positive). When comparing across characteristics or experiences, avoid referring to some people as “normal” implying others are not, or broadly characterizing one group’s experiences as categorically better or worse than others. We also recommend avoiding terms like “vulnerable,” “special needs,” and “X challenged.” We understand there may be exceptions (e.g., medical vision classification systems define a visual acuity as “normal”), but such usage should be footnoted for clarity, and these measures should be relevant to the described work. We expect that authors will review the language in their papers before each submission (initial submission, camera ready), and AC’s, SC’s, and other organizing committee members may request changes to language deemed to be non-inclusive as a condition of acceptance.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Erin Buehler, Google, USA.
- Michael Crabb, University of Dundee, Scotland.
- Mingming Fan, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China.
- Frank Steinicke, University of Hamburg, Germany.
Associate Chairs
- Helen Petrie, University of York, UK
- Timothy Neate, King’s College London, UK
- Garreth Tigwell, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- Roshan Peiris, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- Taslima Akter, University of California Irvine, USA
- Patrick Carrington, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Saad Hassan, Tulane University, USA
- João Guerreiro, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Shital Desai, York University, Canada
- Christopher Bull, Newcastle University, UK
- Emma Nicol, University of Strathclyde, UK
- Wilko Heuten, OFFIS Institute for Informatik, Germany
- Cynthia Bennett, Google, USA
- Abraham Glasser, Gallaudet University, USA
- John Tang, Microsoft Research, USA
- Kotaro Hara, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Oussama Metatla, University of Bristol, UK
- Vinitha Gadiraju, Wellesley, USA
- Vivian Genaro Motti, George Mason University, USA
- Gemma Webster, University of Dundee, UK
- Sergio Sayago, Universitat de Lleida, Spain
- Benjamin Gorman, Bournemouth University, UK
- Dragan Ahmetovic, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
- Abi Roper, City, University of London, UK
- André Pimenta Freire, Federal University of Lavras, Brazil
- Novia Nurain, University of Michigan, USA
- Alisha Pradhan, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
- Sayan Sarcar, Birmingham University, UK
- Lynn Kirabo, Harvey Mudd College, USA
- Gerhard Weber, University of Technology Dresden, Germany
- Krishna Venkatasubramanian, University of Rhode Island, USA
- Oliver Alonzo, DePaul University, USA
- Eshed Ohn-Bar, UCSD, USA
- Danielle Bragg, Microsoft Research, USA
- Zeynep Şölen Yıldız, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Turkey
- Ruolin Wang, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Shea Tanis, University of Kansas, Life Span Institute, USA
- Yi-Hao Peng, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Sabrina Panëels, CEA List, University Paris-Saclay, France
- Sergio Mascetti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
- Lauren Milne, Macalester College, USA
- Hyunggu Jung, Seoul National University, South Korea
- Maitraye Das, Northeastern University, USA
- Andrew A. Bayor, CommonWealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia
- Fabio Paternò, CNR-ISTI, HIIS Laboratory, Italy
- Kathleen McCoy, University of Delaware, USA
- Uran Oh, Ewha Woman’s University, South Korea
- Yasmine N. Elglaly, Western Washington University, USA
- Franklin Mingzhe Li, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Contact: access@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Technology-Mediated Non-pharmacological Interventions for Dementia: Needs for and Challenges in Professional, Personalized and Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Interventions
- Discovering Accessible Data Visualisations for People with ADHD
- Analyzing Accessibility Reviews Associated with Visual Disabilities or Eye Conditions
- Envisioning the (In)Visability of Discreet and Wearable AAC Devices
- Technology Adoption and Learning Preferences for Older Adults: Evolving Perceptions, Ongoing Challenges, and Emerging Design Opportunities
- Screen Recognition: Creating Accessibility Metadata for Mobile Applications from Pixels
- Understanding Older Adults’ Participation in Design Workshops
- The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the “Other”
- “If It’s Important It Will Be A Headline”: Cybersecurity Information Seeking in Older Adults
- Older People Inventing their Personal Internet of Things with the IoT Un-Kit Experience
- Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis
- Making as Expression: Informing Design with People with Complex Communication Needs through Art Therapy
- Methods for Evaluation of Imperfect Captioning Tools by Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Users at Different Reading Literacy Levels
- Caption Crawler: Enabling Reusable Alternative Text Descriptions using Reverse Image Search
- Understanding Older Users’ Acceptance of Wearable Interfaces for Sensor-based Fall Risk Assessment
- People with Visual Impairment Training Personal Object Recognizers: Feasibility and Challenges
- Older Adults Learning Computer Programming: Motivations, Frustrations, and Design Opportunities
Blending Interaction: Engineering Interactive Systems & Tools
This subcommittee focuses on the development of novel interactive systems and “enabling” contributions, which are resources that facilitate the development of future interactive systems and inspire future interface design explorations. Interactive systems combine multiple technical components of hardware, algorithms, human computation, and interaction techniques. Their contributions will be judged by how well they enable and demonstrate novel interactive capabilities. “Enabling” contributions include datasets, tools, libraries, infrastructure, and languages. These contributions will be judged by how well they support the construction, engineering or validation of interactive systems and how well they can be shared among the research community to design future interactive systems.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Andrea Bianchi (KAIST)
- Scott Bateman (University of New Brunswick)
- Amy Zhang (University of Washington)
Associate Chairs
- Jeff Nichols, Apple, USA
- Kimiko Ryokai, University of California Berkeley, USA
- Amy Pavel, University of Texas at Austin, USA
- Hijung Valentina Shin, Adobe Research, USA
- Eytan Adar, University of Michigan, USA
- Kristin Williams, Emory University, USA
- Xu Wang, University of Michigan, USA
- Dongwook Yoon, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
- Emmanuel Pietriga, Inria, France
- Lydia Chilton, Columbia University, USA
- Oliver Schneider, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Andrea Bunt, University of Manitoba, Canada
- Steve Oney, University of Michigan, USA
- Sylvain Malacria, Inria, France
- Tony Tang, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Parmit Chilana, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Masahiko Inami, The Univerity of Tokyo, Japan
- Hariharan Subramonyam, Stanford University, USA
- Caroline Appert, CNRS and Université Paris Saclay, France
- Edith Law, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Anhong Guo, University of Michigan, USA
- Eyal Ofek, The University of Birmingham, UK
- Yasuaki Kakehi, The University of Tokyo, Japan
- Clemens Klokmose, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Uichin Lee, KAIST, South Korea
- Björn Hartmann, University of California Berkeley, USA
- Richard Lin, UCLA, USA
- Artem Dementyev, Google Deep Mind, USA
- Michael Xieyang Liu, Google Research, USA
- Michael Nebeling, University of Michigan, USA
- Tom Yeh, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
- Eric Gonzalez, Google, USA
- Jean Y. Song, Yonsei University, South Korea
- Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, USA
- Suranga Nanayakkara, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Jane L. E, Stanford University, USA
- Anusha Withana, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Ollie Hanton, University of Bath, UK
- Titus Barik, Apple, USA
- Ruofei Du, Google, USA
- Michelle Annett, MishMashMakers, Canada
- Valkyrie Savage, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- April Wang, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
- Toby Li, University of Notre Dame, USA
- Jiannan Li, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Liang He, Purdue University, USA
- Dingzeyu Li, Adobe Research, USA
- Ken Pfeuffer, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Joseph Chee Chang, Allen Institute of AI, USA
- Quentin Roy, Université Grenobles Alpes, France
- Misha Sra, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
- Te-yen Wu, Florida State University, USA
- JeongGil Ko, Yonsei Univeristy, South Korea
- Bruno Fruchard, Inria, France
- Germán Leiva, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Can Liu, City University of Hong Kong,
- Hsin-Ruey Tsai, National Chengchi University, Taiwan
Contact: blend@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Enhancing Cross-Device Interaction Scripting with Interactive Illustrations
- Alloy: Clustering with Crowds and Computation
- Spatio-Temporal Modeling and Prediction of Visual Attention in Graphical User Interfaces
- Mining Human Behaviors from Fiction to Power Interactive Systems
- TableHop: An Actuated Fabric Display Using Transparent Electrodes
- SkullConduct: Biometric User Identification on Eyewear Computers Using Bone Conduction Through the Skull
- Using and Exploring Hierarchical Data in Spreadsheets
- Changibles: Analyzing and Designing Shape Changing Constructive Assembly
- Gesture Script: Recognizing Gestures and their Structure using Rendering Scripts and Interactively Trained Parts
- Smarties: An Input System for Wall Display Development
- Causality: A Conceptual Model of Interaction History
- “Emergent, crowd-scale programming practice in the IDE”
- WatchConnect: A Toolkit for Prototyping SmartWatch-Based Cross-Device Applications
- BaseLase: A Public Interactive Focus+Context Laser Floor
- Gesture On: Enabling Always-On Touch Gestures for Fast Mobile Access from the Device Standby Mode
- Addressing Misconceptions About Code with Always-On Programming Visualizations
- The BoomRoom: Mid-air Direct Interaction with Virtual Sound Sources
- Pervasive Information through Constant Personal Projection: The Ambient Mobile Pervasive Display (AMP-D)
- NewsViews: An Automated Pipeline for Creating Custom Geovisualizations for News
- SmartVoice: A Presentation Support System For Overcoming the Language Barrier
- Zensors: Adaptive, Rapidly Deployable, Human-Intelligent Sensor Feeds
- Blended Recommending: Integrating Interactive Information Filtering and Algorithmic Recommender Techniques
- ModelTracker: Redesigning Performance Analysis Tools for Machine Learning
Developing Novel Devices: Hardware, Materials, and Fabrication
This subcommittee focuses on advancing interaction through developing novel hardware and physical devices. It focuses on work where the core contribution is the new hardware or physical device. Typical contributions include, but are not limited to:
- new sensing and tracking devices
- display technology
- haptics feedback devices
- actuation and robotic approaches
- developments in materials that lead to novel interactive capabilities
- new fabrication techniques
Contributions will be judged based on the novelty of the resulting hardware prototype, the quality of the implementation, the showcased relevance through example applications, and the demonstrated improvements over existing hardware through a technical evaluation and where appropriate a user study. In addition, work in this subcommittee covers design tools that extend the type of interactive devices we can build today.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Jeeeun Kim (Texas A&M University, USA)
- Yang Zhang (UCLA, USA)
Associate Chairs
- Xing-Dong Yang, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Seungwoo Je, Southern University of Science and Technology, China
- Ken Nakagaki, UChicago, USA
- Seongkook Heo, University of Virginia, USA
- Lung-Pan Cheng, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
- Sang Ho Yoon, KAIST, South Korea
- Patrick Baudisch, Hasso Plattner Institute, Germany
- Leah Buechley, U of Mexico, USA
- Thijs Roumen, Cornell Tech, USA
- Nadya Peek, University of Washington, USA
- Michael Rivera, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
- Rong-Hao Liang, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Ryo Suzuki, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
- Alanson Sample, University of Michigan, USA
- Jingyi Li, Pomona College, USA
- Daniel Ashbrook, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Huaishu Peng, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
- Mackenzie Leake, Adobe Research, USA
- Cheng Zhang, Cornell University, USA
- Cindy Hsin-Liu Kao, Cornell University, USA
- Guanyun Wang, Zhejiang University, China
- Jan Borchers, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
- Yudai Tanaka, University of Chicago, USA
- Alexander Adams, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Junyi Zhu, MIT, USA
- Jaeyeon Lee, UNIST, South Korea
- Lea Albaugh, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Contact: devices@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Fiberio: A Touchscreen that Senses Fingerprints
- Fingertip Tactile Devices for Virtual Object Manipulation and Exploration
- DextrES: Wearable Haptic Feedback for Grasping in VR via a Thin Form-Factor Electrostatic Brake
- Trigeminal-Based Temperature Illusions
- ShapeShift: 2D Spatial Manipulation and Self-Actuation of Tabletop Shape Displays for Tangible and Haptic Interaction
- Photo-Chromeleon: Re-Programmable Multi-Color Textures Using Photochromic Dyes
- PrintScreen: Fabricating Highly Customizable Thin-Film Touch-Displays
- Project Jacquard: Interactive Digital Textiles at Scale
- Metamaterial Mechanisms
- Thermorph: Democratizing 4D Printing of Self-Folding Materials and Interfaces
- SATURN: A Thin and Flexible Self-powered Microphone Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerator
- LaserOrigami: Laser-Cutting 3D Objects
- RoMA: Interactive Fabrication with Augmented Reality and a Robotic 3D Printer
- A Layered Fabric 3D Printer for Soft Interactive Objects
- Printed Optics: 3D Printing of Embedded Optical Elements for Interactive Devices
- Shape-Aware Material: Interactive Fabrication with ShapeMe
- The Toastboard: Ubiquitous Instrumentation and Automated Checking of Breadboarded Circuits
- Synthetic Sensors: Towards General-Purpose Sensing
- Wall++: Room-Scale Interactive and Context-Aware Sensing
- HyperCam: Hyperspectral Imaging for Ubiquitous Computing Applications
- Finexus: Tracking Precise Motions of Multiple Fingertips Using Magnetic Sensing
- PrivacyMic: Utilizing Inaudible Frequencies for Privacy Preserving Daily Activity Recognition
- PaperID: A Technique for Drawing Functional Battery-Free Wireless Interfaces on Paper
- Sozu: Self-Powered Radio Tags for Building-Scale Activity Sensing
- FingerTrak: Continuous 3D Hand Pose Tracking by Deep Learning Hand Silhouettes Captured by Miniature Thermal Cameras on Wrist
- Programmable Filament: Printed Filaments for Multi-material 3D Printing
Computational Interaction
This subcommittee invites papers whose primary contribution improves our understanding on how to design interactive systems underpinned by computational principles of human-computer interaction, including applications of such systems. Typical papers study or enhance interaction underpinned by, for instance, machine learning, optimization, statistical modeling, natural language processing, control theory, signal processing and computer vision. Beyond simply applying such methods, they seek new ways to describe, predict, and change interaction and guide the design of interactive systems that rely on computational methods or demonstrate applications of such systems. Core contributions typically take the form of novel theories, methods, techniques, and systems for computational approaches in HCI, as well as reports of rigorous empirical studies of interactive systems supported by computational approaches. Contributions will be judged by their rigor, significance, validity, and practical or theoretical impact.
Accepted papers contribute to our understanding of computational methods in human use of computing. The subcommittee is not limited to algorithms but welcomes a broad range of contributions, including but not limited to:
- Data set or analysis
- Empirical study, including replication studies
- Method
- Theory and modeling
- Design
- Commentary or essay
An excellent paper advances knowledge of computational approaches in human-computer interaction. Even in algorithmic contributions, the human viewpoint is central and kept visible throughout. In particular, an excellent paper 1) addresses a well-scoped phenomenon in human use of computers; 2) rigorously introduces and argues for the chosen approach, including assumptions both about humans and the computational approach, as well as differences and similarities with previous work; 3) explicates the claimed contribution in terms of benefit or disadvantage to humans; 4) provides adequate evidence; and 5) offers a balanced discussion of the contribution, including generalizability and limitations. In addition, critical viewpoints and negative findings are welcome. For example, a critical commentary of social implications of machine intelligence, an empirical insight to algorithmic threats, or a failed replication study are valued as contributions in this subcommittee.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Xiaojuan Ma (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)
- John Williamson (University of Glasgow)
Assistant to the Subcommittee Chairs
- Thomas Weber (LMU Munich, Germany)
Associate Chairs
- Per Ola Kristensson, University of Cambridge, UK
- Lena Mamykina, Columbia University, USA
- Daniel Buschek, University of Bayreuth, Germany
- Sven Mayer, LMU Munich, Germany
- Andrew Howes, University of Exeter, UK
- Andreas Bulling, University of Stuttgart, Germany
- Minsuk Chang, Google Deepmind, USA
- John Dudley, University of Cambridge, UK
- Byungjoo Lee, Yonsei University, South Korea
- Luis A. Leiva, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Roderick Murray-Smith, University of Glasgow, UK
- Jussi P. P. Jokinen, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
- Brian A. Smith, Columbia University, USA
- Yukang Yan, University of Rochester, USA
- Anna Feit, Saarland University, Germany
- Marco Gillies, Goldsmiths University of London, UK
- Julien Gori, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, ISIR, France
- John Zimmerman, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Mihai Bace, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Miroslav Bachinski, University of Bergen, Norway
- Arthur Fleig, University of Leipzig, Germany
- Christoph Gebhardt, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland
- Yi-Chi Liao, Aalto University, Finland
- Changkun Ou, LMU Munich, Germany
- Eldon Schoop, Apple, USA
- Alison M Smith-Renner, Dataminr, USA
- Bereket A. Yilma, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Difeng Yu, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Yuhang Zhao, University of Wisconsin Madison, USA
- João Belo, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany
- Christopher Clarke, University of Bath, UK
- Mitchell Gordon, MIT, USA
- Yue Jiang, Aalto University, Finland
- Ian Oakley, KAIST, South Korea
- Xun Qian, Google, USA
- Chuhan Shi, Southeast University
- Amanda Swearngin, Apple, USA
- Bryan Wang, Adobe Research, USA
- Ziming Wu, Tencent Inc.
- Kening Zhu, City University of Hong Kong, China
- Xingyu Bruce Liu, UCLA, USA
- Markus Klar, University of Glasgow, UK
- Sebastian Stein, University of Glasgow, UK
- Jason Wu, CMU, USA
- Shuai Ma, HKUST, HK
- Chengbo Zheng, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, HK
- Wei Sun, ISCAS, China
- Brian Lim, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Tal August, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Florian Fischer, University of Cambridge, UK
- Linping Yuan, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, HK
Contact: compint@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- XRgonomics: Facilitating the Creation of Ergonomic 3D Interfaces
- Evaluating the Interpretability of Generative Models by Interactive Reconstruction
- A Simulation Model of Intermittently Controlled Point-and-Click Behaviour
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
- Transcalibur: A Weight Shifting Virtual Reality Controller for 2D Shape Rendering based on Computational Perception Model
- Cluster Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy on Smartphones for People with Motor and Situational Impairments
- Optimising Encoding for Vibrotactile Skin Reading
- Crowdsourcing Interface Feature Design with Bayesian Optimization
- Predicting Cognitive Load in Future Code Puzzles
- NVGaze: An Anatomically-Informed Dataset for Low-Latency, Near-Eye Gaze Estimation
- May AI?: Design Ideation with Cooperative Contextual Bandits
- A Bayesian Cognition Approach to Improve Data Visualization
- Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms During Medical Decision-Making
- Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processes
- A is for Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Activities on Young Children’s Perceptions of Robots
- Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
- Understanding the Effect of Accuracy on Trust in Machine Learning Models
- Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services
Critical Computing, Sustainability, and Social Justice
This subcommittee welcomes HCI research connected to themes of social justice, global sustainability, critical-reflective research practice, artful and aesthetic experiences, and critical computing-—all in pursuit of meaningful alternatives to the status quo. We encourage papers that explore how computing and computing research contributes to fair and just relations between individuals, social groups, and whole societies, locally and globally—all in the pursuit of fulfillment and flourishing. Submissions typically feature any combination of one or more of the following:
- Antiracist, decolonial, feminist, and queer critique
- Commitments to equity, sustainability, survivance, and social justice
- Communication of perspectives from marginalized and unheard persons, groups, nations
- Attention to structural processes of power and control that produce and reproduce racialized, gendered, sexist, ableist, hetero/mononormative and colonial/postcolonial forms of violence, vulnerabilities, and exclusions
- Challenges to and/or new analyses of received knowledge and paradigms including critical and progressive accounts of alternative epistemologies, decolonial practices and theories, indigenous knowledges, and Majority Worlds perspectives
- Environmental justice, inter-generational justice, more than human worlds, technology and its implications in the climate crisis
- Explications of values and needs from diverse users and their communities
- Low-energy or zero carbon technologies and ways of life
- The pursuit of artful experiences and aesthetic ways of being and doing
- A robust and open politics
- The prominent use of philosophy and other theory
- The fostering of empathy, imagination, appreciation, and perception as community values
The subcommittee is epistemologically pluralistic, welcoming of a range of perspectives, approaches, and contributions that might take interpretivist, empirical, activist, political, ethical, critical, and/or pragmatic approaches to both societal challenges and how HCI research frames itself in relation to them. As a part of that commitment, we also champion diverse forms of scholarly expression in the CHI community, such as critical essays, research through design, practice-based research, design fictions, and commentaries.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Katta Spiel (Vienna University of Technology, AT)
- Sarah Fox (Carnegie Mellon University, USA)
Associate Chairs
- Michael Muller, IBM Research, USA
- Clara Crivellaro, Newcastle University, UK
- Shion Guha, University of Toronto, Canada
- Samar Sabie, University of Toronto Mississauga, USA
- Saiph Savage, Northeastern University and UNAM, USA
- Katie Seaborn, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
- Ranjit Singh, AI on the Ground, Data & Society Research Institute, USA
- Reem Talhouk, Northumbria University, UK
- Marianela Ciolfi Felice, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Jean Hardy, Michigan State University, USA
- Liesbeth Huybrechts, Hasselt University, Belgium
- Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, USA
- Naveena Karusala, Georgia Tech, USA
- Vera Khovanskaya, University of California, San Diego, USA
- Goda Klumbyté, University of Kassel, Germany
- Bran Knowles, Lancaster University, UK
- Michael Madaio, Google Research, USA
- Fabio Morreale, University of Auckland, New Zealand
- Matt Ratto, University of Toronto, Canada
- Alexandra To, Northeastern University, USA
- Kentaro Toyama, University of Michigan, USA
- Ding Wang, Google Research India, India
- Marisol Wang-Villacres, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
- Cristina Zaga, University of Twente, Netherlands
- Benett Axtell, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Priyank Chandra, University of Toronto, Canada
- Catherine D’Ignazio, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
- Michael Ann DeVito, Northeastern University, USA
- Lara Houston, Anglia Ruskin University,
- Janet Vertesi, Princeton University, USA
- Rua Mae Williams, Purdue University, USA
- Konstantin Aal, Universität Siegen, Germany
- Brett Halperin, University of Washington, US
- Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Intel Labs, US
- Glenda Hannibal, University of Salzburg, Austria
- Janis Meissner, TU Wien, Austria
- Giulia Barbareschi, Keio, Japan
- Hendrik Heuer, Center for Advanced Internet Studies (CAIS) & University of Wuppertal, Germany
- Adrian Friday, Lancaster, UK
- Willie Agnew, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Melanie Feinberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
- Hee Rin Lee, Michigan State University, USA
- Alex Lu, Rutgers, USA
- Yuchen Chen, CUNY Baruch, USA
- Pedro Ferreira, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Yuya Shibuya, Tokyo University, Japan
- Özge Subaşı, Koç University, Turkey
- Devansh Saxena, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Contact: critical@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Ali Alkhatib. 2021. To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445740
- Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Rachel E. Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna Ståhl, Kristina Höök, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Emotion Work in Experience-Centered Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 602:1-602:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300832
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. 1301. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
- Eli Blevis. 2018. Seeing What Is and What Can Be: On Sustainability, Respect for Work, and Design for Respect. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173944
- Zaidat Ibrahim, Pallavi Panchpor, Novia Nurain, and James Clawson. 2024. “Islamically, I am not on my period”: A Study of Menstrual Tracking in Muslim Women in the US. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 686, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642006
- Christina Harrington and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723
- Maria Håkansson and Phoebe Sengers. 2013. Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 2725–2734. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481378
- Nusrat Jahan Mim. 2021. Gospels of Modernity: Digital Cattle Markets, Urban Religiosity, and Secular Computing in the Global South. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445259
- Silvia Lindtner and Seyram Avle. 2017. Tinkering with Governance: Technopolitics and the Economization of Citizenship. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW: 70:1-70:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134705
- Elizabeth Kaziunas, Michael S. Klinkman, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2019. Precarious Interventions: Designing for Ecologies of Care. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 113:1-113:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359215
- Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T ’17), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083688
- Deepika Yadav, Kasper Karlgren, Riyaj Shaikh, Karey Helms, Donald Mcmillan, Barry Brown, and Airi Lampinen. 2024. Bodywork at Work: Attending to Bodily Needs in Gig, Shift, and Knowledge Work. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 383, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642416
- Samar Sabie, Robert Soden, Steven Jackson, and Tapan Parikh. 2023. Unmaking as Emancipation: Lessons and Reflections from Luddism. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 604, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581412
- Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the “Other”. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 298, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528
- Oliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and Andrea Wegner. 2021. Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray Areas. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 466 (October 2021), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479610
- Hee Rin Lee. 2024. Contrasting Perspectives of Workers: Exploring Labor Relations in Workplace Automation and Potential Interventions. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 672, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642907
Design
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that make a significant designerly contribution to HCI. Papers submitted here develop and probe at various concerns, shaping design practice. Contributions include detailed descriptions of and reflections on design processes, interactive products, services, and systems that advance the state of the art; explorations and insights gleaned from working with interactive design materials; suggestions and provocations exploring new design tools, processes, methods, or principles, including those that explore alternatives to scientistic ways of knowing; work that applies perspectives from other disciplines to inspire or to critique the design of interactive things; or work that advances knowledge on the human activity of design as it relates to HCI research or practice. We particularly encourage contributions of new work that engages and builds upon the legacies of design in HCI to broaden the boundaries of interaction design and promote new aesthetic and sociocultural possibilities.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Daisy Yoo (TU Eindhoven, Netherlands)
- Vasiliki Tsaknaki (IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark)
- Noura Howell (Georgia Institute of Technology, USA)
- Clement Zheng (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Associate Chairs
- Anton Poikolainen Rosén, Aalto University, Finland
- Arne Berger, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- Austin Toombs, Indiana University Bloomington, USA
- Aykut Coşkun, Koc University, Turkey
- Çağlar Genç, Tampere University, Finland
- Chris Elsden, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
- Courtney Reed, Loughborough University London, UK
- Daisuke Uriu, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan
- David Chatting, Open Lab, Newcastle University, UK
- Dimitrios Raptis, Aalborg University, Denmark
- Ekaterina Stepanova, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Elena Márquez Segura, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
- Eric Corbett, Google Research, USA
- Fiona Bell, University of New Mexico, USA
- Gabrielle Benabdallah, University of Washington, USA
- Graham Dove, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, USA
- Heidi Biggs, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Holly McQuillan, TU Delft, Netherlands
- Hüseyin Uğur Genç, TU Delft, Netherlands
- HyunJoo Oh, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Jakob Tholander, Stockholm University, Sweden
- Jonas Fritsch, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Laewoo (Leo) Kang, Independent researcher, USA
- Laura Perovich, Northeastern University, USA
- Mafalda Gamboa, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
- Maliheh Ghajargar, Chapman University, USA
- Maria Luce Lupetti, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
- Martin Murer, Salzburg University, Austria
- Mirela Alistar, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
- Nadia Campo Woytuk, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Nazli Cila, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Netherland
- Netta Iivari, University of Oulu, Finland
- Nur Yildirim, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Nusrat Jahan Mim, Harvard Graduate School of Design, USA
- Parinya Punpongsanon, Saitama University, Japan
- Paul Strohmeier, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Germany
- Phillip Gough, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Raquel Robinson, IT University of Copenhagen and Malmö University, Denmark
- Tove Grimstad Bang, Universite Paris-Saclay, Paris
- Troy Nachtigall, TU/Eindhoven and Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands
- Valentina Nisi, ITI – IST, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Newcastle University, UK
- Verena Fuchsberger, University of Salzburg, Austria
- Ying-Yu Chen, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
- Yushan Pan, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China
- Samuelle Bourgault, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
- Kongpyung (Justin) Moon, KAIST, South Korea
- Anna R L Carter, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
- Hyeon Beom Yi, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, South Korea
- Zeyu Huang, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR
- Haipeng Mi, Tsinghua University, China
- Shalaleh Rismani, McGill University, Canada
- Renee Shelby, Google Research, USA
- Dave Murray-Rust, TU Delft, Netherlands
- Matthew Lakier, University of Waterloo, Canada
- MinYoung Yoo, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Renee Nortman, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Lee Jones, Queen’s University, Canada
- Vivian Liu, Columbia University, USA
- Wei Zeng, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China
- Janghee Cho, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Junnan Yu, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China
- Jasmine Lu, University of Chicago, USA
- Katherine Song, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Juan Pablo Martinez Avila, University of Nottingham, UK
- J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, UC Berkeley, USA
- Cesar Torres, University of Texas at Arlington, USA
- Hyungjun Cho, KAIST, South Korea
Contact: design@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Weaving Stories: Toward Repertoires for Designing Things
- Crafting Interactive Circuits on Glazed Ceramic Ware
- Understanding Everyday Experiences of Reminiscence for People with Blindness: Practices, Tensions and Probing New Design Possibilities
- Proceed with Care: Reimagining Home IoT Through a Care Perspective
- Designing Menstrual Technologies with Adolescents
- Sketching NLP: A Case Study of Exploring the Right Things To Design with Language Intelligence
- The SelfReflector: Design, IoT and the High Street
- From Research Prototype to Research Product
- Indoor Weather Stations: Investigating a Ludic Approach to Environmental HCI through Batch Prototyping
- Field Trial of Tiramisu: Crowd-Sourcing Bus Arrival Times to Spur Co-Design
- Making Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera: Reflecting on the Design, Production, Packaging and Distribution of a Counterfunctional Device
- Artful Systems in the Home
- Sabbath Day Home Automation: It’s Like Mixing Technology and Religion
- Empathy and Experience in HCI
- What Should We Expect from Research Through Design?
- Research Through Design as a Method for interaction Design Research in HCI
- On Looking at the Vagina through Labella
- Somaesthetic Appreciation Design
- Making Design Memoirs: Understanding and Honoring Difficult Experiences
- Revisiting the jacquard loom: threads of history and current patterns in HCI
- Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express matters of Concern
- Do-it-Yourself Cellphones: An Investigation into the Possibilities and Limits of High-Tech DIY
- Stay on the Boundary: Artifact Analysis Exploring Researcher and User Framing of Robot Design
- DIYbio Things: Open Source Biology Tools as Platforms for Hybrid Knowledge Production and Scientific Participation
- On the Design of OLO Radio: Investigating Metadata as a Design Material
Games and Play
This subcommittee is suitable for papers across all areas of playful interaction, player experience, and games. Examples of topics include: game interaction and interfaces, playful systems (e.g., toys, books, leisure), the design and development of games (including serious games and gamification), player experience evaluation (player psychology, games user research, and game analytics), the study of player and developer communities, and understanding play. Studies of systems without a gameful or playful component (e.g., basic VR studies) or non-digital games (e.g., board or tabletop gaming without digital components) without a clear contribution to human/player-computer interaction are not within the scope of this subcommittee.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Alena Denisova (University of York, UK)
- Guo Freeman (Clemson University, USA)
Associate Chairs
- Yubo Kou, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Valentin Schwind, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- Madison Klarkowski, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
- Oğuz ‘Oz’ Buruk, Tampere University of Applied Sciences (TAMK), Finland
- Casper Harteveld, Northeastern University, USA
- Zhuying Li, Southeast University, China
- Regan Mandryk, University of Victoria, Canada
- Lucy Amelia Sparrow, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Max V. Birk, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Jinghui Cheng, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada
- Amon Rapp, University of Turin, Italy
- Sebastian Cmentowski, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Susanne Poeller, Utrecht University, Europe
- Bill Hamilton, New Mexico State University, USA
- Joe Marshall, University of Nottingham, UK
- Kathrin Gerling, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Daniel Bennett, University of Bristol, UK
- Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Martin Dechant, University College London, UK
- Richard Wetzel, DePaul University, USA
- Sultan A. Alharthi, University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Laia Turmo Vidal, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Effie Lai-Chong Law, Durham University, UK
- Jonathan Hook, University of York, UK
- Jichen Zhu, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Maximilian Altmeyer, Saarland University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- Katja Rogers, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Xin Tong, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China
- Donghee Yvette Wohn, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
- Nicholas David Bowman, Syracuse University, USA
- Bastian Kordyaka, University of Bremen, Germany
- André Rodrigues, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Seth Cooper, Northeastern University, USA
- Lingyuan Li, University of Texas at Austin, USA
- Dominic Kao, Purdue University, USA
- Arianna Boldi, University of Turin, Italy
- Elisa Mekler, University of Copenhagen (ITU), Denmark
- Gillian Smith, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA
Contact: games@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- The Ethics of Multiplayer Game Design and Community Management: Industry Perspectives and Challenges
- BreathVR: Leveraging Breathing as a Directly Controlled Interface for Virtual Reality Games
- Bots & (Main)Frames: Exploring the Impact of Tangible Blocks and Collaborative Play in an Educational Programming Game
- Cooperating to Compete: the Mutuality of Cooperation and Competition in Boardgame Play
- Empirical Support for a Causal Relationship Between Gamification and Learning Outcomes
- Designing Movement-Based Play with Young People Using Powered Wheelchairs
- Prototyping in PLACE: A Scalable Approach to Developing Location-Based Apps and Games
- Designing Action-Based Exergames for Children with Cerebral Palsy
- Experiencing the Body as Play
- Designing Brutal Multiplayer Video Games
- Extracting Design Guidelines for Wearables and Movement in Tabletop Role-Playing Games via a Research Through Design Process
- The Privilege of Immersion: Racial and Ethnic Experiences, Perceptions, and Beliefs in Digital Gaming
- Video Game Selection Procedures For Experimental Research
- “An Odd Kind of Pleasure”: Differentiating Emotional Challenge in Digital Games
- Player-Driven Game Analytics: The Case of Guild Wars 2
- Understanding and Mitigating Challenges for Non-Profit Driven Indie Game Development to Innovate Game Production
Health
This subcommittee is suitable for contributions related to health, wellness, and medicine, including physical, mental, and emotional well-being, clinical environments, self-management, and everyday wellness. Accepted papers will balance the rigor required in all CHI submissions with awareness of the challenges of conducting research in these challenging contexts. The research problem can be grounded in both formal and informal health and care contexts. Submissions to this subcommittee will be evaluated in part based on their inclusion of and potential impact on their stakeholders. We welcome papers that are empirical, theoretical, conceptual, methodological, design, and systems contributions. Papers must have a clear and novel contribution to HCI in terms of our understanding of people’s interaction with technology in a healthcare context, or the design of health and wellness technologies. For example, systematic reviews or usability studies associated with clinical trials must also have contributions for the HCI community.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Pin Sym Foong (National University of Singapore)
- Daniel Epstein (University of California, Irvine)
- Aneesha Singh (University College London)
Associate Chairs
- Christina Chung, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
- Elizabeth Murnane, Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, USA
- Paweł W. Woźniak, TU Wien, Austria
- Jochen Meyer, Institute for Information Technology (OFFIS), Germany
- Petr Slovak, King’s College London, UK
- Ravi Karkar, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
- Ryan M. Kelly, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia
- Alex Mariakakis, University of Toronto, Canada
- Francisco Nunes, Fraunhofer Portugal AICOS, Portugal
- Katie Siek, Indiana University, USA
- Maria Wolters, The University of Edinburgh, UK
- James Wallace, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Rosa Arriaga, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Ignacio Avellino, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, France
- Amid Ayobi, University College London, UK
- Sang Won Bae, Stevens Institute of Technology, USA
- Yuhan Luo, City University of Hong Kong, China
- Terika McCall, Yale University, USA
- Dilisha Patel, Global Disability Innovation (GDI) Hub, UK
- Kevin Doherty, University College Dublin, Ireland
- Franceli Cibrian, Chapman University, USA
- Maia Jacobs, Northwestern University, USA
- Young-Ho Kim, NAVER AI Lab, South Korea
- Zilu Liang, Kyoto University of Advanced Science, Japan
- Camille Nadal, University College Dublin, Ireland
- Talya Porat, Imperial College London, UK
- Tera Reynolds, University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
- Vedant Swain, Northeastern University, USA
- Jennifer G. Kim, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Pushpendra Singh, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), India
- Xuhai Xu, Columbia University & Google, USA
- Mike Schaekermann, Google, USA
- Stephen Schueller, University of California, Irvine, USA
- Nadir Weibel, University of California, San Diego, USA
- Abdelkareem Bedri, Apple, USA
- Francisco Maria Calisto, IST – U. Lisboa, Portugal
- Varun Mishra, Northeastern University, USA
- Jasmin Niess, University of Oslo, Norway
- Aisling O’Kane, University of Bristol, UK
- Sonali Mishra, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, USA
- Dong Whi Yoo, Kent State University, USA
- Kenny Tsu Wei Choo, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore
- Soojeong Yoo, University of Sydney, Australia
- Shriti Raj, Stanford University, United States
- Alex Waddell, Monash University, Australia
- Tobias Kowatsch, University of Zurich, University of St.Gallen & ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Samantha Chan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA & Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Juan Fernando Meaestre, Swansea University, UK
- Hane Aung, University of East Anglia, UK
- Sophie Lepreux, Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, France
- Daniel Adler, Cornell Tech, USA
- Vladimir Tomberg, Tallinn University, Estonia
- Momona Yamagani, Rice University, USA
- Maarten Houben, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Tim Althoff, University of Washington, USA
- Vineet Pandey, University of Utah, USA
- Jon Bird, University of Bristol, UK
- Lakmal Meegahapola, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, Switzerland
- Wanling Cai, Trinity College Dublin & Lero, Ireland, Ireland
Contact: health@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Reem Talhouk, Sandra Mesmar, Anja Thieme, Madeline Balaam, Patrick Olivier, Chaza Akik, and Hala Ghattas. 2016. Syrian Refugees and Digital Health in Lebanon: Opportunities for Improving Antenatal Health. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 331–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858331
- Elizabeth Stowell, Mercedes C. Lyson, Herman Saksono, Reneé C. Wurth, Holly Jimison, Misha Pavel, and Andrea G. Parker. 2018. Designing and Evaluating mHealth Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 15, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173589
- Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3307–3316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466452
- Yuhan Luo, Peiyi Liu, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2019. Co-Designing Food Trackers with Dietitians: Identifying Design Opportunities for Food Tracker Customization. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 592, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300822
- Elizabeth L. Murnane, Xin Jiang, Anna Kong, Michelle Park, Weili Shi, Connor Soohoo, Luke Vink, Iris Xia, Xin Yu, John Yang-Sammataro, Grace Young, Jenny Zhi, Paula Moya, and James A. Landay. 2020. Designing Ambient Narrative-Based Interfaces to Reflect and Motivate Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376478
- Emma Beede, Elizabeth Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko, Lauren Wilcox, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, and Laura M. Vardoulakis. 2020. A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376718
- Maximilian Dürr, Carla Gröschel, Ulrike Pfeil, and Harald Reiterer. 2020. NurseCare: Design and ‘In-The-Wild’ Evaluation of a Mobile System to Promote the Ergonomic Transfer of Patients. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376851
- Yuan Liang, Hsuan Wei Fan, Zhujun Fang, Leiying Miao, Wen Li, Xuan Zhang, Weibin Sun, Kun Wang, Lei He, and Xiang ‘Anthony’ Chen. 2020. OralCam: Enabling Self-Examination and Awareness of Oral Health Using a Smartphone Camera. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376238
- Sachin R Pendse, Amit Sharma, Aditya Vashistha, Munmun De Choudhury, and Neha Kumar. 2021. “Can I Not Be Suicidal on a Sunday?”: Understanding Technology-Mediated Pathways to Mental Health Support. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 545, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445410
- Ryan M. Kelly, Yueyang Cheng, Dana McKay, Greg Wadley, and George Buchanan. 2021. “It’s About Missing Much More Than the People”: How Students use Digital Technologies to Alleviate Homesickness. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 226, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445362
- Cassidy Pyle, Lee Roosevelt, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. LGBTQ Persons’ Pregnancy Loss Disclosures to Known Ties on Social Media: Disclosure Decisions and Ideal Disclosure Environments. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 543, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445331
- Camille Nadal, Shane McCully, Kevin Doherty, Corina Sas, and Gavin Doherty. 2022. The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 233, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502039
- Ananya Bhattacharjee, Joseph Jay Williams, Jonah Meyerhoff, Harsh Kumar, Alex Mariakakis, and Rachel Kornfield. 2023. Investigating the Role of Context in the Delivery of Text Messages for Supporting Psychological Wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 494, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580774
- Eunkyung Jo, Daniel A. Epstein, Hyunhoon Jung, and Young-Ho Kim. 2023. Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Deploying Conversational AI Leveraging Large Language Models for Public Health Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581503
Interacting with Devices: Interaction Techniques & Modalities
This subcommittee focuses on enabling interactions using different modalities, such as touch, gestures, speech & sound, haptics (e.g., vibrotactile, force feedback), gaze, smell, and physiological signals (e.g., heart rate, muscle tension, brain waves, and breath), on different devices (hand-held, stationary, head-mounted, in midair, on-body) and for different domains (on 2D screens, in 3D environments, as tangibles). Contributions will be judged based on how well a proposed approach solves a significant existing problem or how well it opens new and compelling opportunities for interactions. The novelty of the interaction, its design rationale, and evaluations demonstrating improvements over existing interaction techniques are particularly well suited for this committee.
If the main contribution of a submission is novel hardware or a fabrication method, we ask authors to submit to the Developing Novel Devices subcommittee instead.
Subcommittee Chairs
- David Lindlbauer (Carnegie Mellon University)
- Hasti Seifi (Arizona State University)
Associate Chairs
- Aakar Gupta, Fujitsu Research, USA
- Andy Wilson, Microsoft Research, USA
- Debaleena Chattopadhyay, University of Illinois Chicago, USA
- Peggy Chi, Google DeepMind, USA
- Andreas Fender, University of Stuttgart, Germany
- Jens Grubert, Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Germany
- Steven Houben, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Marcos Serrano, IRIT – University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France, France
- Aluna Everitt, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
- Tiare Feuchtner, University of Konstanz, Germany & Aarhus University, Denmark
- Simon Voelker, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
- Yuntao Wang, Tsinghua University, China
- Shengdong Zhao, City University of Hong Kong, Singapore
- Parastoo Abtahi, Princeton University, USA
- James Eagan, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France
- Adam Fourney, Microsoft Research, USA
- Jens Emil Sloth Grønbæk, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Adobe Research, USA
- Pourang Irani, UBC, Canada
- Timothy Merritt, Aalborg University, Denmark
- Florian Müller, TU Darmstadt, Germany
- Ehud Sharlin, University of Calgary, Canada
- Chi Thanh Vi, International University, VNU-HCM, Vietnam, UK
- Anke van Oosterhout, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Jan Gugenheimer, TU Darmstadt, Germany
- Ryuji Hirayama, University College London, UK
- Sandeep Kaur Kuttal, North Carolina State University, USA
- Mauricio Sousa, Reality Labs Research at Meta, Canada
- Paul Streli, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Qianwen Wang, University of Minnesota, USA
- Wenge Xu, Birmingham City University, United Kingdom
- Hsiang-Ting Chen, University of Adelaide, Australia
- Donald Degraen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Uwe Gruenefeld, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Teresa Hirzle, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Lawrence Kim, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Alexandra Kitson, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Mark McGill, University of Glasgow, UK
- Gunhyuk Park, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Korea
- Enrico Rukzio, Ulm University, Germany
- Vincent Levesque, École de technologie supérieure, Canada
- Craig Shultz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Sangho Suh, University of Toronto, Canada
- Xin Liu, Google & University of Washington, USA
- Dimosthenis Kontogiorgos, MIT, USA
- Jin Ryong Kim, University of Texas at Dallas, USA
- Karthik Mahadevan, University of Toronto, Canada
- Augusto Esteves, ITI / LARSyS, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Chang Xiao, Adobe Research, USA
Contact: inttech@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Object-Oriented Drawing
- Video Browsing by Direct Manipulation
- The Effect of Visual Appearance on the Performance of Continuous Sliders and Visual Analogue Scales
- A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays
- IllumiRoom: Peripheral Projected Illusions for Interactive Experiences
- Draco: Bringing Life to Illustrations with Kinetic Textures
- VelociTap: Investigating Fast Mobile Text Entry using Sentence-Based Decoding of Touchscreen Keyboard Input
- Smart Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy for People with Motor Impairments with Template Matching
- Impact of Task on Attentional Tunneling in Handheld Augmented Reality
- Pinpointing: Precise Head- and Eye-Based Target Selection for Augmented Reality
- One does not simply RSVP: mental workload to select speed reading parameters using electroencephalography
- In-Depth Mouse: Integrating Desktop Mouse into Virtual Reality
- Designing Visuo-Haptic Illusions with Proxies in Virtual Reality: Exploration of Grasp, Movement Trajectory and Object Mass
- Shaping Compliance: Inducing Haptic Illusion of Compliance in Different Shapes with Electrotactile Grains
- Feeling colours: Crossmodal correspondences between tangible 3d objects, colours and emotions
- SensaBubble: A Chrono-Sensory Mid-Air Display of Sight and Smell
- Causality-preserving Asynchronous Reality
Interaction Beyond the Individual
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that contribute to our understanding of collaborative technologies for groups, organizations, communities, and networks. Successful submissions will advance knowledge, theories, and insights from the social, psychological, behavioral, and organizational practice that arise from technology use in various social and collaborative contexts. This subcommittee is also suitable for submissions describing collaborative or crowdsourcing tools or systems.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Stevie Chancellor (University of Minnesota – Twin Cities)
- Niels van Berkel (Aalborg University)
Associate Chairs
- Ujwal Gadiraju, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
- Émeline Brulé, University of Sussex, UK
- Hong Shen, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Matti Nelimarkka, University of Helsinki and Aalto University, Finland
- Tawfiq Ammari, Rutgers University, USA
- Michele Geronazzo, University of Padua, Italy
- Ali Farooq, University of Strathclyde, UK
- Joseph Seering, KAIST, South Korea
- Danula Hettiachchi, RMIT University, Australia
- Chi-Lan Yang, The University of Tokyo, Japan
- Matthieu Tixier, Université de Technologie de Troyes, France
- Tesh Goyal, DeepMind, Google, USA
- Hao-Fei Cheng, Amazon, USA
- Shiwei Cheng, Zhejiang University of Technology, China
- Qian Yang, Cornell University, USA
- Christina Vasiliou, University of York, UK
- Alexandra Papoutsaki, Pomona College, USA
- Zhenhui Peng, Sun Yat-sen University, China
- Zhicong Lu, City University of Hong Kong, China
- Daniel Pires de Sa Medeiros, University of Glasgow, UK
- Jaime Snyder, University of Washington, USA
- Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Universidade de Wisconsin–Madison, USA
- Michael Prilla, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Xi Lu, University of Buffalo, SUNY, USA
- Thomas Neumayr, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Austria
- Amy Melniczuk, Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar,
- Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, USA
- Jack Jamieson, NTT, Japan
- Sebastian Thomas Büttner, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Qiaosi Wang, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Soomin Kim, Samsung Electronics,
Contact: ibti@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- “I normally wouldn’t talk with strangers”: Introducing a Socio-Spatial Interface for Fostering Togetherness Between Strangers
- Understanding Context to Capture when Reconstructing Meaningful Spaces for Remote Instruction and Connecting in XR
- The Walking Talking Stick: Understanding Automated Note-Taking in Walking Meetings
- ‘Keeping our Faith Alive’: Investigating Buddhism Practice during COVID-19 to Inform Design for the Online Community Practice of Faith
- What Life Events are Disclosed on Social Media, How, When, and By Whom?
- Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication
- Current Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Collaborative AR/VR Application Development
- “Oops…”: Mobile Message Deletion in Conversation Error and Regret Remediation
- Designing Telepresence Drones to Support Synchronous, Mid-air Remote Collaboration: An Exploratory Study
- Uncovering the Promises and Challenges of Social Media Use in the Low-Wage Labor Market: Insights from Employers
- Bedtime Window: A Field Study Connecting Bedrooms of Long-Distance Couples Using a Slow Photo-Stream and Shared Real-Time Inking
- Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings
Learning, Education, and Families
The “Learning and Education” component of this subcommittee is suitable for contributions that deepen our understanding of how to design, build, deploy, and/or study technologies for learning processes and in educational settings. Topics may include (but are not limited to): intelligent tutoring systems; cognitive tutors, pedagogical conversational agents, multimedia interfaces for learning; learning analytics; systems for collaborative learning and social discussion; technology-supported learning; teacher/educator-facing designs; and tangible learning interfaces. These may be suitable for a variety of settings: online learning, learning at scale; primary, secondary, and higher education; informal learning in museums, libraries, homes, and after-school settings.
The “Families” component of this subcommittee is suitable for contributions that extend design and understanding of how children, parents, and families interact with technology. Topics may include (but are not limited to) a wide range of domains that span health and well-being, social, psychological, and cultural phenomena.
While submissions will be evaluated for their impact on the specific application and/or group that they address, papers must also make a substantial contribution to HCI. In reflecting on their paper’s potential contribution to HCI, authors may wish to examine past proceedings; see the Contributions to CHI page.
This subcommittee is intended to handle many of the papers that went to and were reviewed under a split of Specific Applications Areas in CHI 2018 and earlier.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Thiemo Wambsganss (Bern University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland)
- Monica Landoni (Università della Svizzera italiana, Switzerland)
- Sayamindu Dasgupta (University of Washington, USA)
- Jennifer Rode (University College London, UK)
Assistant to the Subcommittee Chairs
- Yifan Butsik Feng (University College London, UK)
- Seyed Parsa Neshaei (EPFL, Switzerland)
Associate Chairs
- Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Monash University, Australia
- Michael Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
- Michelle Lui, University of Toronto, Canada
- Elisa Rubegni, Lancaster University, UK
- Min Chi, North Carolina State University, USA
- Pengcheng An, Southern University of Science and Technology, China
- Katie Davis, University of Washington, USA
- Min Fan, Communication University of China, China
- Michael Horn, Northwestern University, USA
- Toni-Jan Keith Monserrat, DLSU, Philippines
- Anthony Pellicone, Falmouth University Games Academy, USA
- Michail Giannakos, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
- Zach Pardos, University of California Berkeley (UC Berkeley), USA
- Julia Woodward, University of South Florida, USA
- Benjamin Xie, Stanford University, University of Denver, USA
- Ishrat Ahmed, Arizona State University, USA
- Zhen Bai, University of Rochester, USA
- Georgie Qiao Jin, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Vanessa Echeverria, Monash University, Australia
- Heidi Hartikainen, University of Oulu, Finland
- Samuli Laato, Gamification Group, Tampere University and University of Turku, Finland
- Olga Viberg, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Marcela Borge, Penn State University, USA
- Richard Lee Davis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Ioana Jivet, FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany
- Mohd Kamal Othman, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
- Cristina Sylla, University of Minho, Portugal
- Rosella Gennari, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy
- Taciana Pontual Falcão, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco – UFRPE (Recife- Brazil), Brazil
- Matthias Söllner, University of Kassel, Germany
- Hua Shen, University of Michigan, USA
- Lucas M. Silva, University of Iowa, USA
- Janet Read, University of Central Lanchashire, UK
- Manolis Mavrikis, UCL, UK
- Kyrill Potapov, UCL, UK
- Stephanie T. Jones, Northwestern University, USA
- Arup Kumar Ghosh, Jacksonville State University, USA
- Ben Rydal Shapiro, Georgia State University, USA
- Amna Liaqat, Princeton University, USA
- Dan Fitton, University of Central Lancashire, UK
- Maristella Matera, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
- Alessandra Melonio, University of Venice, Italy
- Bea S. Wohl, University of the Arts London, UK
- Vicky Charisi, Harvard University, USA
- Daniel Fitton, Lancashire University, UK
- Jessica Roberts, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Teresa Onorati, Carlos III Madrid, Spain
- Saba Kawas, University of Washington & University of Maine, USA
Contact: learning@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Unobtrusively Enhancing Reflection-in-Action of Teachers through Spatially Distributed Ambient Information
- Mudslide: A Spatially Anchored Census of Student Confusion for Online Lecture Videos
- JuxtaPeer: Comparative Peer Review Yields Higher Quality Feedback and Deeper Reflection
- BodyVis: A New Approach to Body Learning Through Wearable Sensing and Visualization
- Science Everywhere: Designing Public, Tangible Displays to Connect Youth Learning Across Settings
- Screen Time Tantrums: How Families Manage Screen Media Experiences for Toddlers and Preschoolers
- Coco’s Videos: An Empirical Investigation of Video-Player Design Features and Children’s Media Use
- Facilitator, Functionary, Friend or Foe?: Studying the Role of iPads within Learning Activities Across a School Year
- An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills
- MapSense: Multi-Sensory Interactive Maps for Children Living with Visual Impairments
- Showing Face in Video Instruction: Effects on Information Retention, Visual Attention, and Affect
- Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners: Toward Data-Driven Design with the OLEI Scale
- Teaching Language and Culture with a Virtual Reality Game
- Mediating Conflicts in Minecraft: Empowering Learning in Online Multiplayer Games
- ThinkActive: Designing for Pseudonymous Activity Tracking in the Classroom
- Group Spinner: Recognizing and Visualizing Learning in the Classroom for Reflection, Communication, and Planning
- As We May Study: Towards the Web as a Personalized Language Textbook
- Why Interactive Learning Environments Can Have It All: Resolving Design Conflicts Between Competing Goals
- ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation Skills
- Wearables for Learning: Examining the Smartwatch as a Tool for Situated Science Reflection
Privacy and Security
This subcommittee is suitable for papers relating to human and usability aspects of privacy and security. This includes but is not limited to: new techniques/systems/technologies, evaluations of existing/new systems, lessons learned from real-world deployments, foundational research identifying important theoretical and/or design insight for the community, etc. Submissions will be judged based on the contribution they make to privacy and security as well as their impact on HCI. For instance, papers that focus on technical contributions will need to show the relationship of the contribution to humans and user experience.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Florian Schaub (University of Michigan, USA)
- Eran Toch (Tel Aviv University, Israel)
Associate Chairs
- Mainack Mondal, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT Kharagpur), India
- Kent Seamons, Brigham Young University, USA
- Tianshi Li, Northeastern University, USA
- Bart P. Knijnenburg, Clemson University, USA
- Elissa Redmiles, Georgetown University, USA
- Zinaida Benenson, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
- Marc Langheinrich, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Switzerland
- Manya Sleeper, Google, USA
- Jose Such, King’s College London & Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, UK
- Ruba Abu-Salma, King’s College London, UK
- Rakibul Hasan, Arizona State University, USA
- Karola Marky, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
- Xin Yi, Tsinghua University, China
- Yixin Zou, Max-Planck Institute for Security and Privacy, Germany
- Pardis Emami-Naeini, Duke University, USA
- Maximillian Golla, CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Germany
- Sauvik Das, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Lindah Kotut, University of Washington, USA
- Emilee Rader, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
- Mahmood Sharif, Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Tousif Ahmed, Google, USA
- Florian Alt, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Germany
- Daricia Wilkinson, Arizona State University, USA
- Gunnar Stevens, University of Siegen, Germany
- Peter Mayer, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark & Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Benjamin Berens, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Chris Kanich, University of Illinois Chicago, USA
- Mohammad Tahaei, International Computer Science Institute (ICSI) & eBay, USA
- Lynne Coventry, Northumbria University, UK
- Cori Faklaris, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA
- Yasemin Acar, Paderborn University, Germany & The George Washington University, USA
- Sanchari Das, University of Denver, USA
- Melanie Volkamer, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Yomna Abdelrahman, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Germany
- Konstantin Beznosov, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Anastasia Sergeeva, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Haojian Jin, UC San Diego, USA
- Kanye Ye Wang, University of Macau, Macau
- Patrick Kelley, Google Inc., USA
- Allison McDonald, Boston University, USA
- Ceenu George, TU Berlin, Germany
- Florian Mathis, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Kami Vaniea, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Christine Utz, Radboud University, Netherlands
- Adam Aviv, The George Washington University, USA
- Sascha Fahl, CISPA Helmholtz-Center for Information Security, Germany
- Nathan Malkin, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
Contact: privacy@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- A Field Trial of Privacy Nudges for Facebook
- Can I Borrow Your Phone?: Understanding Concerns When Sharing Mobile Phones
- Does My Password Go Up to Eleven?: The Impact of Password Meters on Password Selection
- Experimenting at Scale with Google Chrome’s SSL warning
- High Costs and Small Benefits: A Field Study of How Users Experience Operating System Upgrades
- I Feel Like I’m Taking Selfies All Day!: Towards Understanding Biometric Authentication on Smartphones
- In Situ with Bystanders of Augmented Reality Glasses: Perspectives on Recording and Privacy-Mediating Technologies
- Leakiness and Creepiness in App Space: Perceptions of Privacy and Mobile App Use
- “My Religious Aunt Asked Why I Was Trying to Sell Her Viagra”: Experiences with Account Hijacking
- Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments
- Reflection or Action?: How Feedback and Control Affect Location Sharing Decisions
- Scaling the Security Wall: Developing a Security Behavior Intentions Scale (SeBIS)
- Stories from Survivors: Privacy & Security Practices when Coping with Intimate Partner Abuse
- The Presentation Effect on Graphical Passwords
- Unpacking “Privacy” for a Networked World
- Using Personal Examples to Improve Risk Communication for Security & Privacy Decisions
- Touch Me Once and I Know It’s You! Implicit Authentication Based on Touch Screen Patterns
- Passquerade: Improving Error Correction of Text Passwords on Mobile Devices by using Graphic Filters for Password Masking
Specific Applications Areas
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that extend knowledge of how to design, build, deploy, and/or study technologies for specific application areas, user groups, or domains of interest to the HCI community, that are not explicitly covered by another subcommittee. Example application areas and user groups are listed below. Submissions will be evaluated in part based on their impact on the specific application area and/or user group that they address, in addition to their impact on the HCI community and the quality of the research methods employed.
Example user groups: people in low- and middle-income countries, charities and third sector organizations, marginal/marginalized population, workers, people with disabilities, non-human stakeholders (such as insects, animals), farmers, and children.
Example application areas: ICTD, HCI4D, creativity, making and fabrication, home, participatory/participative cultures, rural communities, smart and connected communities, transportation, urban informatics, health of marginalized groups, civic engagement, intimate interaction, child-computer interaction, and animal-computer interaction.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Adrian Clear (University of Galway)
- Matthew Louis Mauriello (University of Delaware)
- Laura Maye (University College Cork)
Associate Chairs
- Auk Kim, Kangwon National University, South Korea
- Aakash Gautam, University of Pittsburgh, USA
- Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, University of Glasgow, UK, UK
- Simo Hosio, University of Oulu, Finland, Finland
- Chuang-Wen You, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, Taiwan
- Aditya Vashistha, Cornell University, USA, USA
- Sowmya Somanath, University of Victoria, Canada
- Abigail Evans, University of York, UK
- Rébecca Kleinberger, Northeastern University & Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
- Eleonora Mencarini, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy
- Dina Sabie, Humber College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Jamie Mahoney, Northumbria University, UK
- Guanhong Liu, Tongji University, China
- André Calero Valdez, University of Lübeck, Germany
- Robert Xiao, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Alberto Monge Roffarello, Politecnico di Torino, Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Italy
- Kurtis Heimerl, University of Washington, USA
- Rosanna Bellini, Cornell Tech, USA
- Kate Howland, University of Sussex, UK
- Charlotte Robinson, University of Sussex, UK
- Effie Le Moignan, Northumbria University, UK
- Mary Lou Maher, Computing Research Association (CRA), USA
- Josua Krause, Accern, USA
- Christopher Quintana, University of Michigan, USA
- Sandip Chakraborty, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India
- Alexander Quinn, None, USA
- Sunyoung Kim, Rutgers University, USA
- Mohamed Kari, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany and incoming at Princeton University, USA
- Rajesh Veeraraghavan, Georgetown University, USA
- Adrian Hazzard, Nottingham, UK
- Rama Aditya Varanasi, New York University, USA
- Karthik S Bhat, Drexel University, USA
- Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Aalborg University, Denmark
- Gianluca Schiavo, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Italy
- Alan Chamberlain, University of Nottingham, UK
- George Hope Chidziwisano, University of Tennessee, USA
- Caroline Pitt, University of Washington, USA
- Mehdi Rizvi, Heriot-Watt University, UK
- Briane Paul V. Samson, De La Salle University, Philippines
- Stacey Scott, University of Guelph, Canada
- Ha-Kyung Hidy Kong, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- Linda Hirsch, UCSC Santa Cruz, USA
- Tiffany Barnes, NC State, USA
- Carolin Reichherzer, Independent
Contact: specapps@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Investigating Genres and Perspectives in HCI Research on the Home
- Understanding and Mitigating the Effects of Device and Cloud Service Design Decisions on the Environmental Footprint of Digital Infrastructure
- BodyVis: A New Approach to Body Learning Through Wearable Sensing and Visualization
- MapSense: Multi-Sensory Interactive Maps for Children Living with Visual Impairments
- Motif: Supporting Novice Creativity through Expert Patterns
- Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services: A Qualitative Study of Affected Community Perspectives on Algorithmic Decision-making in Child Welfare Services
- Online Grocery Delivery Services: An Opportunity to Address Food Disparities in Transportation-scarce Areas
- Mapping the Margins: Navigating the Ecologies of Domestic Violence Service Provision
- Guerilla Warfare and the Use of New (and Some Old) Technology: Lessons from FARC’s Armed Struggle in Colombia
- From Her Story, to Our Story: Digital Storytelling as Public Engagement around Abortion Rights Advocacy in Ireland
- Practices and Technology Needs of a Network of Farmers in Tharaka Nithi, Kenya
- Empowerment on the Margins: The Online Experiences of Community Health Workers
- Design Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh
- Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps
Understanding People
This subcommittee welcomes submissions whose primary contribution targets an improved understanding of people and/or interactional contexts, as opposed to submissions whose primary focus is on understanding the system or technology. Most submissions are empirical in nature, but they can also be conceptual. For empirical papers, the research can use statistical and quantitative, qualitative, or mixed and alternative methods.
Suitable topics for the subcommittee include, but are not limited to: individual behavior, human performance, as well as group, social, and collaborative behaviors and action. Core contributions typically take the form of insightful findings, evolved theories, models, concepts, or methods. Submissions may examine technology practices of diverse populations, and unique, understudied cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic contexts. Contributions will be evaluated for their rigor, significance, originality, validity, and practical or theoretical contributions.
You can submit directly to an Understanding People split depending on the primary method used. Choosing the appropriate method split will ensure the ACs and reviewers are suitable to evaluate your paper’s methods. The options are:
- Statistical and quantitative methods. For example, papers that use experimental manipulations and statistical methods to derive conclusions, papers that use large datasets and (statistical, analytical) models to derive conclusions, or papers that develop or examine quantitative methods for HCI research
- Qualitative methods. Papers whose contributions rest on methods such as interviews, observations, focus groups, diaries, (auto-)ethnography, specific document / content analysis, etc., where the implications of the work may not be generalizable, but add further insights to our understanding of human behavior.
- Mixed and alternative methods: 1) a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods where the combination of the two approaches is significant; and 2) alternative or novel research methods, such as action research, first-person research, etc.
Understanding People — Statistical and Quantitative Methods
Subcommittee Chairs (Statistical and Quantitative Methods)
- Q. Vera Liao (Microsoft Research)
- Erin T. Solovey (Worcester Polytechnic Institute / Harvard University)
- Ming Yin (Purdue University)
Associate Chairs
- Tun Lu, Fudan University, China
- Ahmed Sabbir Arif, University of California, Merced, USA
- Sanjay Kairam, Reddit, Inc., USA
- Madeleine Steeds, University College Dublin, Ireland
- Manoel Horta Ribeiro, EPFL, Switzerland
- Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, University of Southern California / Cornell University, USA
- Chao Zhang, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Jie Cai, Tsinghua University, China
- Sanorita Dey, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), USA
- Eugenia H. Rho, Virginia Tech, USA
- Ashwin Ram, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany
- Spencer Williams, University of Washington, USA
- Koustuv Saha, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Eshwar Chandrasekharan, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Ziang Xiao, Johns Hopkins University, USA
- Harmanpreet Kaur, University of Minnesota, USA
- S. Shyam Sundar, Penn State University, USA
- Andrew Kun, University of New Hampshire, USA
- Wen Duan, Clemson University, USA
- Camellia Zakaria, University of Toronto, Canada
- Susan Fussell, Cornell University, USA
- Gilles Bailly, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, France
- Michael Rohs, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany
- Daniel Rough, University of Dundee, UK
- Jaime Ruiz, University of Florida, USA
- Hyo Jin (Gina) Do, IBM, USA
- Anastasia Kuzminykh, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Canada
- Monica Perusquia-Hernandez, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
- Janet Johnson, University of Michigan, USA
- Shaun Wallace, University of Rhode Island, USA
- Zahra Ashktorab, IBM Research, USA
- Jie Gao, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore
- Jeongmi Lee, KAIST, Korea
- Mark E. Whiting, University of Pennsylvania, USA
- Felix Putze, University of Bremen, Germany
- Leanne Hirshfield, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
- Michael Knierim, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany
- Fiona Draxler, University of Mannheim, Germany
- Smit Desai, Northeastern University, USA
- Yuan Sun, University of Florida, USA
- Hancheng Cao, Emory University, USA
- Jonathan Dodge, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Ting-Hao ‘Kenneth’ Huang, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Yun Wang, Microsoft, China
- Baptiste Caramiaux, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, France
- Nicholas Vincent, Simon Fraser University, Canada
Contact: people-quant@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Inferring Cognitive Models from Data using Approximate Bayesian Computation
- Explaining the Gap: Visualizing One’s Predictions Improves Recall and Comprehension of Data
- HARK No More: On the Preregistration of CHI Experiments
- Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines
- Measuring Employment Demand Using Internet Search Data
- Sensing Interruptibility in the Office: A Field Study on the Use of Biometric and Computer Interaction Sensors
- A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk
- Heartbeats in the Wild: A Field Study Exploring ECG Biometrics in Everyday Life
- Review of Quantitative Empirical Evaluations of Technology for People with Visual Impairments
- Proxemics for Human-Agent Interaction in Augmented Reality
- Changes in Research Ethics, Openness, and Transparency in Empirical Studies between CHI 2017 and CHI 2022
- Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views
- Can Voice Assistants Be Microaggressors? Cross-Race Psychological Responses to Failures of Automatic Speech Recognition
- Save A Tree or 6 kg of CO2? Understanding Effective Carbon Footprint Interventions for Eco-Friendly Vehicular Choices
- Bias-Aware Systems: Exploring Indicators for the Occurrences of Cognitive Biases when Facing Different Opinions
- Short-Form Videos Degrade Our Capacity to Retain Intentions: Effect of Context Switching On Prospective Memory
- User Preference and Performance using Tagging and Browsing for Image Labeling
- Fingerhints: Understanding Users’ Perceptions of and Preferences for On-Finger Kinesthetic Notifications
- Inform the uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered Chatbot
Understanding People — Qualitative Methods
Subcommittee Chairs (Qualitative Methods)
- Louise Barkhuus (Rutgers University)
- Joel Fischer (Nottingham University)
Associate Chairs
- John Rooksby, Northumbria University, UK
- Mark Rouncefield, Lancaster University, UK, UK
- Konstantin Aal, University of Siegen, Germany
- Pam Briggs, Northumbria University, UK
- Shaun Lawson, Northumbria University, UK
- Paul Marshall, University of Bristol, UK
- Mohammad Rashidujjaman Rifat, University of Toronto, Canada
- Mark Warner, University College London, UK
- Fatemeh Alizadeh, University of Siegen, Germany
- Adriana Alvarado Garcia, IBM Research, USA
- Jacky Bourgeois, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Yung-Ju Chang, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
- Reza Hadi Mogavi, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Jina Huh-Yoo, Drexel University, USA
- Juliana Jansen Ferreira, Brazil
- Vaishnav Kameswaran, University of Michigan, USA
- Agnieszka Kitkowska, Jönköping University, Sweden
- Maria Matsangidou, CYENS Centre of Excellence
- Nora McDonald, George Mason University, USA
- Christine Murad, University of Toronto, Canada
- Hannah Pelikan, University of Linköping, Sweden
- Gisela Reyes-Cruz, University of Nottingham, UK
- Sabirat Rubya, Marquette University, USA
- Stine S. Johansen, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
- Eike Schneiders, University of Nottingham, UK
- Xinhuan Shu, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Jaisie Sin, University of Toronto, Canada
- Velvet Spors, Tampere University, Finland
- Sharifa Sultana, UIUC,
- Hanuma Teja Maddali, University of Maryland, USA
- Elena Agapie, University of California, Irvine, USA
- Andrew Begel, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, University of Michigan, USA
- Afsaneh Razi, Drexel University, USA
- Pam Wisniewski, Vanderbilt, USA
- Ewan Soubutts, University College London, UK
- Felix Carros, University of Siegen, Germany
- Preeti Mudliar, International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore, India
- Diva Smriti, Drexel University, USA
- Divya Ramesh, University of Michigan, USA
- Maulishree Pandey, Google, USA
- Zainab Agha, Vanderbilt, USA
- Tyler Reinmund, Oxford University, UK
- William Seymour, King’s College London, UK
- Jun Hu, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- MD Romael Haque, Purdue University, USA
- Philip Engelbutzeder, University of Siegen, Germany
- Elaine Czech, University of Bristol, UK
- Rebecca Nicholson, Northumbria University, UK
- Nađa Terzimehić, LMU Munich, Germany
Contact: people-qual@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- “That Courage to Encourage”: Participation and Aspirations in Chat-based Peer Support for Youth Living with HIV
- More Kawaii Than a Real-Person Live Streamer: Understanding How the Otaku Community Engages with and Perceives Virtual YouTubers
- Religion and Women’s Intimate Health: Towards an Inclusive Approach to Healthcare
- Your Money’s No Good Here: The Introduction of Compulsory Cashless Payments on London’s Buses
- I’d Hide You: Performing Live Broadcasting in Public
- Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community
- Sharing Personal Content Online: Exploring Channel Choice and Multi-Channel Behaviors
- Dear Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences
- Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments
- Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life
Understanding People — Mixed and Alternative Methods
Subcommittee Chairs (Mixed and Alternative Methods)
- Steven Dow (UC San Diego)
- Heloisa Candello (IBM Research)
Associate Chairs
- Mary Jean Amon, University of Central Florida, USA
- Salvatore Andolina, University of Palermo, Italy
- Regina Cheng, Apple, USA
- Sarah Clinch, The University of Manchester, UK
- Enrico Costanza, University College London, UK
- Dilrukshi Gamage, University of Colombo School of Computing, Sri Lanka
- Diego Gómez-Zará, University of Notre Dame, USA
- Nuwan Janaka, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Marina Kogan, University of Utah, USA
- Xingyu Lan, Fudan University, China
- Min Lee, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Myeong Lee, George Mason University, USA
- Tianyi Li, Purdue University, USA
- Stephen MacNeil, Temple University, USA
- Nikolas Martelaro, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Nicholas Micallef, Swansea University, UK
- Marianna Obrist, UCL, UK
- Monica Pereira, Brunel University, UK
- Simon Perrault, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore
- Sean Rintel, Microsoft, UK
- Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- Antti Salovaara, Aalto University, Finland
- Samiha Samrose, Stealth Startup, USA
- Md. Sami Uddin, University of Regina, Canada
- Markel Vigo, Manchester University, UK
- Yu-Chun (Grace) Yen, UC San Diego / National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University (from Feb), USA
- Michael Gilbert, Google, USA
- Maria Roussou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
- Corina Sas, Lancaster University, UK
- Alex Williams, Amazon, USA
- Darren Gergle, Northwestern University, USA
- Sarah Sterman, University of Illinois, USA
- Tiffany Knearem, Google UX, USA
- Vikram Mohanty, Bosch, USA
- Sukrit Venkatagiri, Swarthmore College, USA
- Hua Shen, University of Michigan, USA
- Srishti Palani, Tableau, USA
- Martin Kocur
- Justin Edwards
- Kanya(Pao) Siangliulue
- Bingsheng “Arthur” Yao
- IIaria Torre
- David Lee, USA
- Ajit Jain, Audigent, USA
Contact: people-mixed@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Understanding Design Tradeoffs for Health Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Approach
- How to Guide Task-oriented Chatbot Users, and When: A Mixed-methods Study of Combinations of Chatbot Guidance Types and Timings
- Navigating Relationships and Boundaries: Concerns around ICT-uptake for Elderly People
- Tech Help Desk: Support for Local Entrepreneurs Addressing the Long Tail of Computing Challenges
- Digital Portraits: Photo-sharing After Domestic Violence
- Consumption experiences in the research process
- Barriers to Online Dementia Information and Mitigation
- Considerations for Implementing Technology to Support Community Radio in Rural Communities
- Feminist Living Labs as Research Infrastructures for HCI: The Case of a Video Game Company
- Understanding Frontline Workers’ and Unhoused Individuals’ Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Services
- DataHalo: A Customizable Notification Visualization System for Personalized and Longitudinal Interactions
- Stakeholder-Centered AI Design: Co-Designing Worker Tools with Gig Workers through Data Probes
User Experience and Usability
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that extend the knowledge, practices, methods, components, and tools that make technology more useful, usable, and desirable. Successful papers will present results, practical approaches, tools, technologies, and research methods that demonstrably advance our understanding, design, and evaluation of user experience and/or usability. The focus is on usability and user experience of widely used technologies with contributions being judged substantially on the basis of their demonstrable potential for effective reuse and applicability across a range of application domains or across a range of design, research, and user communities.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Erin Cherry (OUSD (R&E))
- Tobias Höllerer (University of California, Santa Barbara)
- Alexander Meschtscherjakov (University of Salzburg)
- Yaxing Yao (Virginia Tech)
Associate Chairs
- Andres Lucero, Aalto University, Finland
- Henning Pohl, Aalborg University, Denmark
- Tilman Dingler, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Bastian Pfleging, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
- Eduardo Velloso, University of Sydney, Australia
- Frank Bentley, Google, USA
- Mark Billinghurst, University of South Australia, Australia
- Morten Fjeld, Chalmers University, Sweden and University of Bergen, Norway
- Thomas Kosch, HU Berlin, Germany
- Andreas Riener, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Germany
- Benjamin Tag, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Rahul Divekar, Educational Testing Service, USA
- Abdallah El Ali, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), Netherlands
- Jennifer Ferreira, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
- Andrii Matviienko, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Mark Colley, UCL, UK
- Markus Tatzgern, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Austria
- Chen Chen, University of California San Diego, USA
- Daniel Gardner, Chapman University, USA
- Viktorija Paneva, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Germany
- Katharina Pohlmann, University of Glasgow, UK
- Adwait Sharma, University of Bath, UK
- Sunjun Kim, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Korea
- Sooyeon Jeong, Purdue University, USA
- Feiyu Lu, JPMorgan Chase, USA
- Na Du, University of Pittsburgh, USA
- Zikai Wen, Virginia Tech, USA
- Leah Zhang-Kennedy, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Daisuke Sakamoto, Hokkaido University, Japan
- Florian Daiber, DFKI, Germany
- Carolina Fuentes, Cardiff University, UK
- Giovanni Troiano, Northeastern University, USA
- Francesco Chiossi, LMU Munich, Germany
- Steeven Villa, LMU Munich, Germany
- Qiushi Zhou, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Tanusree Sharma, Penn State, USA
- Matthias Baldauf, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland
- Nadine Wagener, University of Bremen, Germany
- Habiba Farzand, University of Bristol, UK
- Johannes Zagermann, University of Konstanz, Germany
- Brandon Syiem, University of Sydney, Australia
- Yuxi Wu, Northeastern University, USA
- Luke Haliburton, LMU Munich, Germany
- Maximilane Windl, LMU Munich, Germany
- Xian Xu, HKUST, Hong Kong
- Matin Yarmand, UC San Diego, USA
- Marvin Andujar, University of South Florida, USA
- Ananya Bhattacharjee, University of Toronto, Canada
- He “Albert” Zhang, Penn State University, USA
- Shashank Mehrotra, Honda Research Institute, USA
- Ville Mäkelä, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Anirudha Joshi, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
- Lonni Besancon, Monash University, Australia
- Joongi Shin, Aalto University, Finland
- Juan Pablo Carrascal, Microsoft, Spain
- Samantha Finkelstein, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Don Samitha Elvitigala, Monash University, Australia
- Hans-Christian Jetter, University of Lübeck, Germany
- Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Northeastern University, USA
- Wallace Lages, Northeastern University, USA
- Carlos Toxtli Hernandez, Clemson University, USA
- Richard Skarbez, La Trobe University, Australia
- Glenn Lematta, The MITRE Corporation, USA
Contact: ux@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Dance and Choreography in HCI: A Two-Decade Retrospective
- Designing Clinical AAC Tablet Applications with Adults who have Mild Intellectual Disabilities
- Breaking The Experience: Effects of Questionnaires in VR User Studies
- A Wee Bit More Interaction: Designing and Evaluating an Overactive Bladder App
- The Effect of Thermal Stimuli on the Emotional Perception of Images
- Understanding the Relationship between Frustration and the Severity of Usability Problems: What can Psychophysiological Data (Not) Tell Us?
- Developing and Validating the User Burden Scale: A Tool for Assessing User Burden in Computing Systems
- Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning? Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences
- VelociTap: Investigating Fast Mobile Text Entry using Sentence-Based Decoding of Touchscreen Keyboard Input Computation of Interface Aesthetics
- Effects of Ad Quality & Content-relevance on Perceived Content Quality
- Mediating Attention for Second Screen Companion Content
- S.O.S.: Does Your Search Engine Results Page (SERP) Need Help?
- Stock Lamp: An Engagement-Versatile Visualization Design
- Panopticon as an eLearning Support Search Tool
- Causing Commotion with a Shape-changing Bench: Experiencing Shape-Changing Interfaces in Use
- Cognitively Inspired Task Design to Improve User Performance on Crowdsourcing Platforms
- Exploring the Usefulness of Finger-Based 3D Gesture Menu Selection
- Investigating the Feasibility of Extracting Tool Demonstrations from In-Situ Video Content
- MinEMail: SMS Alert System for Managing Critical Emails
- Show me the Invisible: Visualizing Hidden Content
- A Multi-Site Field Study of Crowdsourced Contextual Help: Usage and Perspectives of End-Users and Software Teams
- Emotions, Experiences and Usability in Real-Life Mobile Phone Use
- I Am The Passenger: How Sickness Caused By In-Car VR HMD Use Is Influenced by Visual Conveyances Of Motion
- Supporting the Use of User Generated Content in Journalistic Practice
- Increasing Users’ Confidence in Uncertain Data by Aggregating Data from Multiple Sources
- Understanding Public Evaluation: Quantifying Experimenter Intervention
Visualization
The Visualization subcommittee welcomes papers from all areas of data visualization and visual analytics. This includes, but is not limited to, new visualization or interaction techniques/systems/technologies, evaluations of existing or new visualization systems and techniques, groundwork identifying important theories or insights for the community, and lessons learned from real-world designs and deployments. Submissions will be judged based on the contribution they make to visualization as well as their impact on HCI. For example, papers that focus on technical contributions need to show how these relate to humans and user experience.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Adam Perer (Carnegie Mellon University, USA)
- Michael Sedlmair (University of Stuttgart, Germany)
Associate Chairs
- Niklas Elmqvist, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Benjamin Bach, Inria & University of Edinburgh, UK
- Tim Dwyer, Monash University, Australia
- Matthew Kay, Northwestern University, USA
- Justin Matejka, Autodesk Research, Canada
- Melanie Tory, Northeastern University, USA
- Bum Chul Kwon, IBM Research, USA
- Vidya Setlur, Tableau Research, USA
- Jian Zhao, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Nadia Boukhelifa, Université Paris-Saclay, France
- Anamaria Crisan, Tableau Research, USA
- Petra Isenberg, National Institute for Research in Digital Science and Technology (INRIA), France
- Quan Li, ShanghaiTech University, China
- Zhicheng Liu, University of Maryland College Park, USA
- Narges Mahyar, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
- Cagatay Turkay, University of Warwick, UK
- Yalong Yang, Georgia Tech, USA
- Matthew Brehmer, Tableau Research, USA
- Christopher Bryan, Arizona State University, USA
- Zhutian Chen, University of Minnesota, USA
- Angus Forbes, Purdue, USA
- Carolina Nobre, University of Toronto, Canada
- Arnaud Prouzeau, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Inria, France
- Kim Sauvé, University of Bath, UK
- Nicole Sultanum, Tableau Research, USA
- Theophanis Tsandilas, Université Paris-Saclay, Inria, France
- Romain Vuillemot, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France
- Aoyu Wu, Harvard University, USA
- Meng Xia, Texas A&M, USA
- Fumeng Yang, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
- Michael Correll, Northeastern University, USA
- Yingcai Wu, Zhejiang University, China
- Yunhai Wang, Renmin University of China, China
- Denis Kalkofen, Flinders University (Graz University of Technology), Australia
- Kuno Kurzhals, University of Stuttgart, Germany
- Ali Sarvghad, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
- Mahmood Jasim, Louisiana State University,
Contact: vis@chi2025.acm.org
Example Papers
- Understanding Data Accessibility for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Data@Hand: Fostering Visual Exploration of Personal Data on Smartphones Leveraging Speech and Touch Interaction
- Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online
- Techniques for Flexible Responsive Visualization Design
- InChorus: Designing Consistent Multimodal Interactions for Data Visualization on Tablet Devices
- Deimos: A Grammar of Dynamic Embodied Immersive Visualisation Morphs and Transitions
- A Probabilistic Grammar of Graphics
- Data is Personal: Attitudes and Perceptions of Data Visualization in Rural Pennsylvania
- ActiveInk: (Th)Inking with Data
- Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research
- Data Illustrator: Augmenting Vector Design Tools with Lazy Data Binding for Expressive Visualization Authoring
- When David Meets Goliath: Combining Smartwatches with a Large Vertical Display for Visual Data Exploration
- Uncertainty Displays Using Quantile Dotplots or CDFs Improve Transit Decision-Making
- Explaining the Gap: Visualizing One’s Predictions Improves Recall and Comprehension of Data
- GraphScape: A Model for Automated Reasoning about Visualization Similarity and Sequencing
- Visualization Literacy at Elementary School
- Towards Understanding Human Similarity Perception in the Analysis of Large Sets of Scatter Plots
- Egocentric Analysis of Dynamic Networks with EgoLines
- Investigating the Direct Manipulation of Ranking Tables for Time Navigation
- Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts
- Monadic Exploration: Seeing the Whole Through Its Parts
- Weighted Graph Comparison Techniques for Brain Connectivity Analysis
- Wrangler: Interactive Visual Specification of Data Transformation Scripts
- Sizing the Horizon: The Effects of Chart Size and Layering on the Graphical Perception of Time Series Visualizations